But if we're not gonna have that, and obviously we won't, than we have to tax people properly, and it sure isn't normal or sane to have similar kind of taxes to the people who earn few thousands dollars a year and the people who earn billions. It is the government who can say what do you do with your money because obviously the government taxes you, or it isn't? So, if we're gonna hold on to your attitudes, we need to have a complete anarchy and no taxes at all. So, the government can provide enough taxes to make sure society works well and that no one lives poor or homeless. But when we look at it politically it is the government who needs to take care of that, because government represents the people and is directly responsible to the people. It is the people who should be giving as well, when we look at it morally. I never said 'most of their earnings', you said that, I said 20 percent of their annual salaries, which is far from the most of their incomes. And the government has no right to tell anyone what to do with their hard earned money. I know I would,because I like to give, but to force it is wrong. ![]() If I had million or billions, I would give a lot. This whole mentality of "the super rich need to give most of their earnings to those who need it" is sad and pathetic and needs to stop, for real. It creates resentment and makes the individual not want to give when they are forced. Giving is from the heart and is voluntary, not forced and should never be that way. Yes, some are stingy, but it isn't our place to tell them what they have to do with their money. Second, many of these "super rich" people are already very charitable and donate a lot of their money to the needy. Who are you and who am I to tell anyone what to do with their money? We have no right to MAKE them give anything or a certain amount. It isn't right to force anyone to donate or to tax the crap out of them just because they have money. Charitable donations to legit charities is the way to go, as it is up to the individual to help those in need and for the charities to do their job. It is up to every one of us to help in any way we can. It isn't up to the government who is essentially broke, to help, either. They have nothing to lose by doing it, cause they'll still be super rich, and they have a lot to gain actually.įirst of all, it isn't up to people with billions of dollars to help those who have nothing. They can, and need to play their part in the wellbeing of the society. ![]() They lived in the society, got raised, got educated, treated for any kind of diseases, etc. They didn't came rich in Mars and came to the Earth. And as I've said, their owe their success to the society and they need to give the society back. American dream has nothing to do with that, they already have all their possible dreams fulfilled. I'm talking about super rich people, people who already made it, and have everything they want. What you say about american dream has nothing to do with this. So, not that it's not doable, but it actually works better than the way most of the companies do business. Or you're saying that it is more important to make sure that people can earn countless billions of dollars than to ensure that these problems I mentioned should be solved?Īnd as in the case of Dan Price, google about him, is proved and it is that it is possible to lower your income as an owner of the company and radically raise the payment of your workers and to become even more successful. Simply by taxing the people who have much more than they need. ![]() It makes too much mess, too much damage to the environment, too much underpaid people, poor people, homeless people, people dying because of curable illnesses and etc. Simply, the capitalism as it's practiced in the US doesn't work. I don't hate anyone, hate has nothing to do with my attitudes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |